
I occasionally visit
BlogCatalog to partake of the discussion forums, read others comments, see what ruses bloggers are using to generate traffic to their sites and shake my head in disdain at the "Can you make money from blogging?" brigade.
One recent-ish discussion that generated 800+ replies was the classic "Do you believe in God? Yes or no?" debate. The originator stipulated "I want you to tell me if you believe in God or not. If you said Yes, tell me one reason why. and if you said no, tell me one reason why not?"
As you would expect this degenerated fairly quickly into two camps - the Saved (or Believers if you prefer) and the Damned (or those with their heads screwed on). Guess where I landed?
I would like to pick on two of the main arguments purported by the Saved:
1. The "God is everywhere" theorem.
So for every "Gods exists in the beauty of rainbows" we have a "God also exists in the destruction of hurricanes" or for every "God exists in the bountiful harvest" we have a "God exists in the gaping mouths of starving children" or for every "God exists in the kindness of strangers" we have a "God exists in the torturer's implements and the pitiful cries of the torturer's victim".
If God is
everywhere and
omnipotent then he must also be without a
moral sense. If God has no moral sense then one of underlying premises of the Church, to teach and differentiate between good and evil (or right and wrong), has no basis. Further to this, the teachings of the Church would stand in direct contradiction to God the Being. The Church would be imposing upon God their interpretation of his essence, which
they see as 'good', as opposed to recognising his non-moral existence, that is
he 'decides not to intervene in Earthly matters'. (I use the terms essence and existence here as
existential terms)
I don't say this to disprove the existence of God but to highlight the innate flaw in organised religion which, I think, leads us further towards the conclusion that God is man-made - an attempt, if you will, to inculcate upon the many the moral beliefs of the few.
2. The "Spirit" or "Seek inside yourself and ye shall find God" theorem.
Now, this appears to be in direct contradiction to argument 1 above. If God is everywhere then why does the individual need to discover an "inner spirituality" to find Him? Hmmmm...
But lets not deny the religious nuts their opinion.
If God is
inside me then he has to be a construct of mine - that is, I
have to have created Him. Now whether I created him using my mind or using some unknown quantity, lets call it a 'soul' for the sake of argument, that does not lessen the fact that I made Him.
If, on the other hand, the religious argument is that God wasn't made by me but is, in fact, some latent Being residing within me that only a significant amount of 'soul-searching' will discover then lets look at that. By my very nature I can only be aware of that which I am aware of (bare with me) so if I am not
aware of my soul then how do I rake through it to find this mysterious third-party?
Lets give them one more chance. If we assume the term soul-searching is actually a quasi-religious way of saying "giving something some very serious thought" then I have to use my brain for that purpose. If I am using my brain then I am not using, or indeed searching, my soul. At the end of that process if I choose to take a "leap of faith" and find God then it has still only ever been an entirely introspective process, using my synapses, so we must still come to the conclusion that I have created God within me. Ergo he can
not exist outside of any given individual and must, therefore, be a man-made construct.
Still, as long as the Church coffers keep filling and we keep teaching our children this hocus-pocus tale of salvation then I am sure we will all remember to stay put in our, very humble, places devoid of any aspiration for improvement in the (very real) World.
The Sisters Of Mercy - Body And Soul (EP) (Merciful Release MR029T 1984)
- Body And Soul
- Body Electric
- Train
- Afterhours
Body And Soul - pwd: c4ctusm0uth